Civilia 2021, 12(2):59-67 | DOI: 10.5507/civ.2021.010

Teaching Ethnology and Ethnography during Global Pandemic: Few Remarks from Slovakia

Michal Uhrin
Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Filozofická fakulta, Katedra etnológie a muzeológie, Gondova ulica 2, 811 02 Bratislava 1, Slovenská republika

Klíčová slova: Ethnography, Ethnology, Field research, Covid-19, Pandemic, Slovakia

In the middle of March 2020, due to the global pandemic of Covid-19 disease, Comenius University in Bratislava switched to distance method of education. The transition to distance teaching and learning and restriction of contact with "unknown people" profoundly affected the teaching activities of the Department of Ethnology and Museology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University in Bratislava. In this paper I describe how the way of teaching theory and methodology of ethnology and socio-cultural anthropology as well as methods and techniques, utilised in ethnographic research, had to be adapted to novel conditions. I will also address how the structure of ethnographic field research, conducted by first year bachelor students of ethnology, had to be changed regarding government restrictions associated with Covid-19 pandemic.

Grants and funding:

This text was created with the support from Grant of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic VEGA no. 1/0194/20 Moral narratives about religious and ethnic groups in the teaching of selected subjects in primary schools.

Zveřejněno: 15. prosinec 2021  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Uhrin, M. (2021). Teaching Ethnology and Ethnography during Global Pandemic: Few Remarks from Slovakia. Civilia, 12(2), 59-67. doi: 10.5507/civ.2021.010
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)

    • Reference

    1. BENEDICT, R. Patterns of Culture. London: Routledge, 1935.
    2. BERG, L. B. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston/London: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
    3. BERNARD, H. R. Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 1995.
    4. BOELLSTORFF, T., NARDI, B., PEARCE, C., TAYLOR, T. L. Ethnography and Virtual World: A Handbook of Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. BOGATYRIOV, P. Funkcie kroja na moravskom Slovensku. Turčiansky sv. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1937.
    6. BOGORAZ, V. Ideas of space and time in the conception of primitive religion. In American Anthropologist, 1925, Vol. 27, Nr. 2, pp. 205-266.
    7. BUŽEKOVÁ, T., DUBRAVČÁK, J. Politizácia nebezpečenstva koronavírusu: riziko a morálka. Postoje voči vládnym opatreniam a názorom odborníkov počas prvej vlny pandémie na Slovensku. In Etnologické rozpravy, 2021, Vol XXVIII, Nr. 1, pp. 8-21.
    8. CRESWELL, J. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Research Approaches. London: Sage, 2014.
    9. DURKHEIM, E. Elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press, 1995.
    10. HINE, C. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
    11. FROBENIUS, L. The childhood of man: a popular account of the lives, customs and thoughts of the primitive races. London: Seeley, 1909.
    12. GEERTZ, C. Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
    13. LEAVY, P. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York: Guilford Press, 2017.
    14. LETT, J. Science, Reason and Anthropology. The Principles of Rational Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
    15. LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1963.
    16. MALINOWSKI, B. Argounauts of the Western Pacific. London: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd., 1932.
    17. MEAD, M. Coming of Age in Samoa. New York: William Morrow, 1928.
    18. MELICHERČÍK, A. Teória národopisu. Liptovský sv. Mikuláš: Tranoscius, 1945.
    19. SANJEK, R., TRATNER, S. W. (ed.) eFieldnotes: The makings of anthropology in the digital world. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. SHIROKOGOROFF, M. S. Psychomental Complex of the Tungus. London: Kegan Paul, 1935.
    21. SPRADLEY, P. J. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1979.
    22. SPRADLEY, P. J. Participant Observation. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1980.
    23. TURNER, V. The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Cornell University Press, 1991.
    24. TYLOR, E. B. Primitive Culture. New York: Henry Hold and Company, 1883.
    25. UHRIN, M., BESEDOVÁ, Z., MESÍČKOVÁ, M., PAVLÍKOVÁ, N. Komunikácia, rekreácia a humor: ako pandémia COVID-19 ovplyvnila životy ľudí na Slovensku. In Etnologické rozpravy, 2021, Vol XXVIII, Nr. 1, pp. 96-110.

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah