Civilia 2024, 15(2):22-41 | DOI: 10.5507/civ.2025.005

Populism in the Czech academy: Approaches and Definitions in Academic Theory and PracticeOriginal contributions, Original article, Research article

Jan Křovák
Institut komunikačních studií a žurnalistiky, Fakulta sociálních věd Univerzity Karlovy

This article deals with populism in its various forms and how the Czech academic public perceives this phenomenon. The research, based on a questionnaire survey and content analysis of final theses’, shows which approaches (ideological, political-strategic, discursive...) to populism are most common in the Czech Republic, which topics are most often dealt with by analysts and students, or which authors are considered the most credible in the Czech Republic in relation to the study of populism. Examples of good practice for teaching about populism are also included

Keywords: populism, ideology, political communication, academia, study
Grants and funding:

Tento příspěvek je financován z programu Cooperatio.

Received: January 23, 2025; Accepted: January 28, 2025; Published: February 24, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Křovák, J. (2024). Populism in the Czech academy: Approaches and Definitions in Academic Theory and Practice. Civilia15(2), 22-41. doi: 10.5507/civ.2025.005
Download citation

References

  1. ARAÚJO, Bruno; PRIOR, Hélder. Framing political populism: The role of media in framing the election of Jair Bolsonaro. Journalism Practice, 2021, 15.2: 226-242. Go to original source...
  2. BARR, Robert R. Populism as a political strategy. In: Routledge handbook of global populism. Routledge, 2018. s. 44-56. Go to original source...
  3. BUŠTÍKOVÁ, Lenka; GUASTI, Petra. The state as a firm: Understanding the autocratic roots of technocratic populism. East European Politics and Societies, 2019, 33.2: 302-330. Go to original source...
  4. CASSELL, Kaitlen J. The populist communication strategy in comparative perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 2023, 28.4: s. 725-746. Go to original source...
  5. CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY. Cambridge Dictionary's Word of the Year 2017. (cit. 18. 7. 2024). Dostupné z: https://dictionaryblog.cambridge.org/2017/11/29/cambridge-dictionarys-word-of-the-year-2017
  6. DALY, Tom. Populism, public law, and democratic decay in Brazil: understanding the rise of Jair Bolsonaro. In: This paper was prepared for the 14th International Human Rights Researchers' Workshop:'Democratic Backsliding and Human Rights', organised by the Law and Ethics of Human Rights (LEHR) journal. 2019. p. 2-3. Go to original source...
  7. DE VREESE, Claes H. Political journalism in a populist age. Harvard Kennedy School, Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, December, 2017, 11.
  8. EVANS, Richard. Is Populism a Threat to Democracy?. Gresham College, 2020, 16.
  9. HAVLÍK, Vlastimil. Technocratic populism and political illiberalism in central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism, 2019, 66.6: 369-384. Go to original source...
  10. HAWKINS, Kirk A. Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 2009, 42.8: s. 1040-1067. Go to original source...
  11. HAWKINS, Kirk A.; KALTWASSER, Cristóbal Rovira. The ideational approach to populism. Latin American Research Review, 2017, 52.4: s. 513-528. Go to original source...
  12. KALTWASSER, Cristóbal Rovira. How to define populism?: Reflections on a contested concept and its (mis) use in the social sciences. In: Populism and the Crisis of Democracy. Routledge, 2018. p. 62-78. Go to original source...
  13. LACLAU, Ernesto. On populist reason. Verso, 2005.
  14. LACLAU, E. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory New Left Books. 1977.
  15. LACLAU, Ernesto; MOUFFE, Chantal. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso Books, 2014.
  16. MACKERT, Jürgen. Introduction: Is there such a thing as populism?. In: Populism and the Crisis of Democracy. Routledge, 2018. p. 1-13. Go to original source...
  17. MANUCCI, Luca. Populism and the Media. The Oxford handbook of populism, 2017, s. 467- 488. Go to original source...
  18. MAZZOLENI, Gianpietro. Populism and the media. In: Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. p. 49-64. Go to original source...
  19. MEYER, Brett. A playbook against populism? Populist leadership in decline in 2021. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. (cit. 30. 7. 2024) Dostupné z: https://institute. global/sites/default/files/articles/A-Playbook-Against-Populism-Populist-Leadership-in-Decline-in-2021. pdf, 2022.
  20. MUDDE, Cas. An ideational approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
  21. MUDDE, Cas. The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 2004, 39.4: 541-563. Go to original source...
  22. MUDDE, Cas; KALTWASSER, Cristóbal Rovira. Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, 2017. Go to original source...
  23. NICHOLSON, Stephen P.; SEGURA, Gary M. Who's the party of the people? Economic populism and the US public's beliefs about political parties. Political Behavior, 2012, 34: s. 369-389. Go to original source...
  24. OCIEPKA, Beata (ed.). Populism and media democracy. Wdawn. Uniwersytetu Wrocawskiego, 2005.
  25. OSTIGUY, Pierre, et al. A socio-cultural approach. The Oxford handbook of populism, 2017, s. 73-97. Go to original source...
  26. SPITTLER, Marcus. Are right-wing populist parties a threat to democracy?. Democracy and crisis: Challenges in turbulent times, 2018, 97-121. Go to original source...
  27. TÄNNSJÖ, Torbjörn. Populist democracy: A defence. London: Routledge, 1992.
  28. WEYLAND, Kurt. A political-strategic approach. The Oxford handbook of populism, 2017, s. 48-72. Go to original source...
  29. WEYLAND, Kurt. Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative politics, 2001, s. 1-22. Go to original source...
  30. ZULIANELLO, Mattia. Varieties of populist parties and party systems in Europe: From state-of-the-art to the application of a novel classification scheme to 66 parties in 33 countries. Government and Opposition, 2020, 55.2: s. 327-347. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.